• About the Author
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Return to Queer Paranormal
  • Archive for the ‘beliefs’ Category

    "Hello. I’d Like to Have an Argument."


    2009 - 03.19

    It’s been another one of those crazy weeks. People disappearing, people popping up out of nowhere, health problems with people around me, and the usual insanity I call my life. And then, I made the mistake last weekend of answering a question on an online forum: do you believe in ghosts? I said more than just ‘yes’.

    In hindsight, it was a bad idea. Many people respond in grunts, syllables, or not at all to statements that they know will lead to arguments or complaints. One-word responses leave little to fight over. But some people just like arguing.

    What followed was a prolonged attack since, apparently, stating that I’m a “paranormal investigator” automatically means I speak on behalf of every parapsychologist, researcher, professor, scientist, writer, ghost hunter, and anyone else (alive or dead) in any way connected to the field. The same old arguments rehashed a billion times flung at me, demanding ultimate “proof”. But, of course, it wasn’t in a polite discourse; it’s the typical heckling of someone who, no matter what is presented to them, remains convinced that you’re an idiot.

    I see we haven’t changed much since the Puritans. Witch hunts are still happening. Different is bad. In only a few sentences stating my opinions, I instantly turned into Frankenstein’s monster. What do you do? If you walk away, you’re supposedly admitting “that they are right”, but if you stand and defend yourself, you’re “absurd”. It’s a lose-lose situation. But it comes from speaking your mind and being a part of this field. Opening your mouth makes you a target of torch-bearing townsfolk rallying to “burn the witch”.

    I hate arguing. Especially when it’s pointless or when someone belittles your words because “they know everything”. Real stupidity comes from believing that you’re omniscient and omnipotent. Only wise people know that they don’t know everything. but I let it go on for a while before stopping and thinking, “what the hell am I doing?” Discussing something with someone who can’t see beyond their own window to the world is the most wasteful thing anyone can do.

    I like letting people make their own informed opinions, as everyone should. Don’t just spit out what someone else told you; review everything and form your own opinion. And if it’s different from someone else’s, big friggin’ deal! Guess what? Everyone has an opinion, a belief, a perspective. Being loud doesn’t mean you know more than someone else; it just means your mouth opens wider.

    Humankind has the capacity to become rabid dogs. People like to gang up with viciousness to feel inflated about their own superiority. But, when the attack is on them, everything is very different. That’s just mean! Well, that’s just human nature. Evil doesn’t come from supernatural demons, it comes from the depths of humankind. Humanity has a tendency to be inhumane. And it circles itself; call it karma if you wish, but the stream of putrid words we sometimes spill out come back at us in a different form. And when they do, we have no right to complain. We did it once ourselves.

    Agreeing to disagree or seeing another viewpoint is a challenge for many people. But we all see the world differently. Every man or woman is the product of his or her collective beliefs, experience, and thoughts. More time is wasted on pointless back-and-forth banter than actual reasoning. In a way, it’s comical. If people could see the humor in it, of course.

    I guess what bothers me most is, being an open-minded person, I expect to be treated as I treat others. I could be cruel and nasty many times, but I choose to let most things slide. I try to make people think and reason, prepare for what is coming, yet it is labeled “non-conformity”. So what? I’m not a conformist. I’m an individual. If I’m the only one not running with the herd, it makes me an independent thinker not an anarchist. Different is good; different brings about revolutionary thought and ideas. If it weren’t for outcasts, nothing would ever change. Ideas are what separate us from our inner animal. If being a non-ape makes me a bad person to somepeople, I’ll settle for that.

    But I’m Wearing a Freudian Slip…


    2009 - 02.13

    Friday the 13th is upon us once more. Another jinxed day which, for those of us who are single and/or unfortunate in love, quite fittingly is a precursor to Valentine’s Day. But perhaps black cats, dead people, and lunatics deserve just as much love…

    I have had a very productive week with writing and after today’s frantic typing, I should be on track for an early deadline. It’s a relief to know that in a few short weeks, this book should be complete. While it won’t be completely written to my own satisfaction, gathering all the required information and history would require another year and a small fortune in travel, inquiries, and hands-on investigation. So, I’ll settle for being more thorough than others in the past and giving as full a story as I can in the alloted time.

    My thoughts this week have drifted to psychology, perhaps in part from reading William March’s The Bad Seed. That, combined with past experience and discussions in psychology, made me realize what a pseudoscience the field really is. I know some people may disagree, but the truth is we still know little about the mind, its functions, and human behavior. For every shrink who states emphatically the causes of one human thought process, another declares the exact opposite as truth. People are categorized into boxes as they best fit for diagnosis. Dreams are interpreted by some as subliminal messages, and to others as the mind discarding useless crud. When some personality traits and outside that “type”, they are discarded and dismissed… it is “close enough”, they say.

    What’s scientific about being “close enough”? Should a panther be lumped into the canine family simply because it shares many characteristics? Hardly. And when it comes to the paranormal, we often make the same hasty assumptions. An orb is paranormal because it’s semi-transparent and odd. Sometimes, it coincides with other experiences. We assume so much is paranormal because it’s “close enough”. Therefore, if psychology is viewed as legitimate science, shouldn’t parapsychology be just as accepted?

    I’m not saying any one is true and the other false. It’s just a random thought. I’ve always been an odd thinker. I remember back in my early school years being taught in basic science about light and color. Teachers told me that objects appear as a certain color because they reflect that shade of the light spectrum. Leaves are green because they reflect green light, etc. My initial thought (which has never been answered sufficiently) was this: if that’s true, then what color are things really? Is the world composed merely of black, white, and all shades between? Color is merely an illusion, is it not? Things have certain properties which cause them to reflect colors, so they aren’t really those colors, right?

    Yes. I think far too much.

    Reality is very subjective. The world around us is entirely open to interpretation. Like psychology and the paranormal. And the insane. What if insanity is really sanity? What if being sane is, in fact, being delusional? Who can say for sure? Is a black-and-white photograph a true representation of our world? Is someone who talks to “invisible people” simply seeing and hearing what we cannot? Is life one prolonged dream from which we only awake at our death to realize our life has only begun? These are all strange and frightening ideas. But what if they’re true?

    The more we try to unravel the mysteries of the universe, the more puzzling everything becomes. If religion is nonsense, paranormal is bunk, and magic doesn’t exist, is life the biggest delusional sham? Isn’t everything we do beyond basic survival and propagation of the species one big lie to fool ourselves into believing we have meaning? Remember, we’re just animals in the grand scheme of things. Is love just an accidental chemical reaction?

    The real question is, do we want to know the answers? Human beings dislike reality. Illusion is safer. Fiction more tantalizing. Reality is a sleeping pitbull in the corner of the room. Better not wake it up…

    “…and how does that make you feel?”

    Thar She Blows…


    2008 - 12.12

    In the past few months, I have been bombarded with conflicting views and beliefs ranging from pure science to total mysticism. People bring up interesting points about the supernatural, some strong in their convictions and crusading for a new path in either extreme. Coupled with the experience of watching countless organizations spring up and start at the same square all others have before, it makes you think. And it makes me remember my own journey at a younger age.

    Watching everyone paving trails and bolstering their “new” views reminds me of a quote I stumbled across several months ago. If anything, it sums up my stance better than anything else.

    I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.”

    The paranormal realm is comparable to the Greek king Sisyphus repeatedly pushing a massive boulder uphill only to watch it roll back to the bottom. Each new investigator enters the scene with delusions of grandeur, only to end up in the same rut pushing another rock. It wears you down until many people either give up or lose ambition. Most never achieve pop star status. Irrefutable evidence becomes the elusive great white whale. Ghost hunters turn into bearded Ishmaels with EMF detectors.

    The sad truth is we may never find Moby Dick. No amount of believing or disbelieving will change that. It becomes a bitter curse. The cold, calculable world of science takes a toll on our beliefs.

    Yet I like to picture life with some magic and mystery left in it. Many people hold some religious principles to be true without hard science. Are they wrong for doing so? Hardly. It is a human condition to have some form of faith. Faith holds society together. It gives reason to hope and avoids complete chaos. Just imaging a world absent of beliefs and faith. No consequences in the hereafter. No morals. No good triumphing over evil. Every man and woman for himself in a blind, unscrupulous fight for survival. It would mean a real Armageddon with disastrous results.

    The existence of ghosts may rely on faith, but that doesn’t make it a sect, necessarily. Spirituality deals with the intangible. Ideas, thoughts, and principles. The pursuit of spirits is about perceivable phenomena: touch, smell, sight, and sound. While belief in ghosts may be a form of religion, the pursuit is perceptibly different.

    Should everyone believe in ghosts? Not at all. It is not my life’s ambition to play Jesus and attempt to convert masses of people to some new religion. I lay my views and opinions out on the table allowing anyone who wants to look and gather from it what they wish. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. If you want to know the answer to the existence of ghosts, find out for yourself. That has been my stance for many years and will not change. I’m not a prophet. If anything, I’m a tour guide.

    At least by directing supernatural tourists, my dignity remains relatively unscathed.

    "Believe Only Half of What You See…"


    2008 - 10.19

    “… and none of what you hear.”

    This proverb holds true in most facets of life. Even in the paranormal realm.

    I am occasionally perplexed by the steady influx of opinions purported to be my own. Things like “well, you believe that ____”, “you don’t like ____”, and “you think ____ isn’t real” pop up occasionally in my life from friends, family, and even colleagues. Some is true. Some is exaggerated. And some I have no idea where it came from.

    I think it’s as good a time as any for me to lay my views of some paranormal topics out on the table for all to see. Hopefully, it will clear the air and give me a chance to state my case for having the opinions which I hold on to for the moment.

    Orbs: Simply put, orbs have become what I term “the new plague” of the paranormal realm. Thousands of people have ghost pictures to share of fuzzy blobs on digital images. The vast majority are very easy to explain away as dust, pollen, insects, moisture, etc. I blame it on the digital age we live in. Digital cameras have a nasty habit of accentuating tiny particles in front of the flash and lens, giving them a pronounced presence. Older photographic techniques, including 35mm film and Polaroid images, do not show there particles as readily, so the orb phenomenon is quite new. With so many natural possibilities, dubbing any digital picture of a round foggy circle as paranormal is almost impossible to do with any sound evidence to back it up. Does this mean I don’t believe in orbs existing? Not at all. I have captured unusual round anomalies on 35mm which could be questionable and have even witnessed balls of glowing light with my own eyes. I believe in the possibility that orbs in some from can exist, but I don’t trust a digital camera to show conclusive proof of one.

    UFOs: With the billions of stars and planets, the odds are good that life exists elsewhere. But does it visit us? Well, it’s theoretically possible in some remote plausibilities, but the likelihood of aliens stopping by for a cup of tea is shady at best. Some have theorized that they would send machines instead which could survive prolonged space travel, so perhaps that theory carries slight weight. I do believe that anything is possible, so I don’t want to discount it entirely. I would probably need to witness something unquestionable before I gave it more serious thought.

    Ouija: Parlor game or gateway to hell? Well, in my opinion it’s a bit of both and neither at the same time. In basic principle, a Ouija board is a game using subconscious thoughts to manifest results by people unaware of the movements. Is it ghosts? It certainly could be. Yet you wouldn’t really know what spirit was moving the planchette. To say that George Washington would make a trip to your living room to entertain slumber party guests is a bit unfathomable and absurd. I usually liken it to randomly dialing a phone number and asking questions to the person on the other end. As far as it having evil possibilities, I don’t quite believe that for certain. Of the millions of boards floating around in households around the globe, the number of horror stories is miniscule.

    Magick: I’ll address both spell magic and voodoo. Often, we see some positive results of some magic and spells, but that doesn’t automatically mean it works in the manner we expect. I liken some of it to the placebo effect. If someone knows you’ve cast a spell against them, sometimes they wil behave as though the spell worked and bring about the outcome simply because they believe in it. Sometimes, the simple idea that some individual has hexed you can give the wanted result without even having done anything magickal. Still, sometimes magick is performed and gives the requested result. Is it coincidence or proof positive? Honestly, I don’t know. I like to think that there is some merit to some forms of magick simply because it makes life more interesting. But as for giving it my full confidence and relying on it as a definitive power, I can’t quite swallow that pill. I’ve seen agreeable results and I’ve seen spells do absolutely nothing. It’s still a toss-up to me.

    Cleansings: By cleansings, I mean either a) getting rid of a spirit; or b) ridding a place of negative energies. As for the latter, I don’t think it hurts. I’ve been known to burn white sage here and there many times over the last decade or more of my life. I give Native Americans a bit of credit at knowing something right by practicing this for thousands of years. I think it’s something anyone can do and even if it doesn’t work in the eyes of scientific peoples, a little incense is at least good aromatherapy. As for ridding a place of a ghost, that’s a bit of a confluct in my morals. I just don’t do it. I don’t bellieve I have the right to go into anyone’s house and tell whatever ghost resides there that they should leave. It’s not my place (literally). In 19 out of 20 cases of hauntings, people are simpy afraid for no valid reason. Laying down a few ground rules and agreeing to stay out of each other’s way generally does the trick. As for eviction, I’m not here to play landlord.

    EVPs: I really do enjoy trying to capture voices on audio tape. And I do believe they are possible. Of course, there are cases of mistaken identity. Sometimes we forget who spoke or small sounds made against a recorder can be amplified by contact with the device. There has also been evidence over the years that radio waves can create sound on tapes in certain conditions. Others have recenty started using radio stations to attempt to capture EVP with the use of a “ghost box”, or device that scans stations in an effort to find ghostly sounds. Odds are some sound clips will start forming words at random intervals so that alone makes the device extremelt questionable to me. And with EVPs themselves, there are some that people claim say certain words and phrases which are not that obvious. I think that people try to find fitting words too many times. There’s never anything wrong with saying, “I don’t know what it says.”

    Exorcism: Getting rid of demonic entities is a view on which I often clash with people. Firstly, I don’t believe in demons. Or the devil. I believe in a simple good and bad. And ghosts can fall into either category. In the case of possession (and people often forget just how rare of an occurrence this really is), some people try to force the spirit out of a person. Some will even exorcise a residence to rid it of an entity. As for people being exorcised, I can see why in some extreme circumstances that might be viewed as a necessity, but I don’t touch that. I have definite beliefs that religion and paranormal events do not need to be mixed. Would a Catholic rite of exorcism work on a Buddhist? I’m not sure, yet it might be strange for the person going through it and cause them much internal conflict. As for exorcising a house, that falls under eviction and is not my territory. I agree that something causing serious problems or endangering individuals is not something to keep around, but imposing one religious view above all others should be the judgement of the victim. Many beliefs have methods of ridding evil spirits, so keeping an open mind is best. Too much emphasis is placed on Christian methodology and considering that some of us live in a land of “separation between church and state”, the same rue should apply to other facets. You woudn’t read a passage from the Bible at a Wiccan funeral, so why forget this ;ogic with spirits of the dead?

    Psychic Impressions: This is a big grey area for me. I have conflicting views on psychics. Some are decent and at the very least are trying to honestly help people while others perpetrate fraud to earn money. but do I believe in psychic ability? Well, the scientific part of me knows that even the best psychics have an accuracy record of between 10 to 20 percent. Yet I have heard things from psychics I have worked with that ended up being true, in locations they couldn’t have known anything about prior to their visit. I do believe in the possibility (since I never rule anything out absolutely), but I’m all for verification. Psychic evidence can be a good way to piece things together, but it only gains validity with fact-checking. Still, I do believe we all possess some psychic ability. We have our own intuitions. We should heed and acknowledge psychic impressions and gut feelings but never treat them as the ultimate source of knowledge.

    Bigfoot: With the latest bigfoot news story ending in a hoax, many people have decided to dismiss all bigfoot tales as fiction. I don’t know if it exists, but I do know that there are probably species we are still unaware of living in the world. We discover new animals, insects, and plants every day. Why couldn’t Bigfoot be one of them? Just because we can look at maps on Google and see the globe doesn’t mean we see everything at every second. There is much unexplored and uninhabited land around the globe. While I may not have a definitive answer, I can’t rule out the possibility.

    Most of these beliefs and views are formed from my own personal experiences. They change with a certain ebb and flow, evolving over time at a constant pace and are sometimes subject to alteration. I don’t profess that my view is the “be all and end all” and I believe every human being has the right to his or her own beliefs and the freedom to interpret what they wish in the manner which best suits them. Definitive statements in such a hazy field are often subjective.

    Yet this is who I am. This is part of who I have become and the thoughts which float about in my head.

    In this world, there is a staggering number of humans. Each has his or her own set of thoughts, opinions, and beliefs. Diversity is human existence. Yet diversity is under a constant stream of attack. Conformity is the strong undercurrent running beneath our individuality, threatening at every waking moment to sweep our feet out from beneath us and drag us out to sea. Being an individual is the single hardest struggle. We fight to “blend in”, be it with coworkers, family, or friends. And we often have to sacrifice who we are in order to feel a part of some subset.

    If you believe something different than I do, so be it. I am not a preacher nor a dictator.

    I’d rather be hated or loathed for one of my personal beliefs than loved for pretending to purport what others want me to think. Love me or hate me, I am myself. And that’s one thing I will never lose.

    Worrywart Occultists…


    2008 - 10.04

    When we lack control over our lives, we seek out some form of structure to grasp. Apparently, this applies to beliefs in the supernatural.

    Studies conducted at Illinois’ Northwestern University have discovered a correlation between the level of stress someone feels and their beliefs in superstitious thoughts.

    The findings were recently published in Science. Yet given the current state of affairs, some statements are hardly shocking: “On a national level, when times are economically uncertain, superstitions increase.”

    Half of the participants were asked to recall situations where they had no control over the outcome and reflect on the experience. They were then shown groupings of dots—some arranged in patterns, others randomly. While feeling under pressure, nearly 50% of stressed volunteers saw hidden images in the random patterns. This same group seemed to have a higher likelihood to believe in conspiracy theories and lucky objects.

    Professor Jennifer Whitson of the University of Texas presided over the research. “People see false patterns in all types of data, imagining trends in stock markets, seeing faces in static, and detecting conspiracies between acquaintances,” she said. “This suggests that lacking control leads to a visceral need for order – even imaginary order.”

    So, when we can’t control something, we use our imagination. Sounds like politics to me…

    A Little Manifesto…


    2008 - 08.14

    On April 27, 1932, American poet Hart Crane leapt off the rear deck of the ship Orizaba not far from the Florida coast. His body was never recovered.

    In many ways, I can understand Crane’s life (and death). He was a fellow Ohioan, born in the small town of Garrettsville, not too terribly far from where I was born and raised. He never felt like he belonged anywhere he went, be it New York or Mexico. He struggled for acceptance in literary circles and was a bit of a laughing stock among the intellectually elite. He was a simple man with a simple education who used a dictionary to find the big words to make his poetry “sing”.

    But at the end of the day, he was just a plebeian… a high school dropout… with what some might call delusions of grandeur.

    We often live in a world of mediocrity, trapped between ignorant dimwits and superior scholars and shunned by both. Society is one huge ladder, overflowing with people scampering among the rungs to reach higher levels. All we manage to do is step on each other’s faces.

    Perhaps this is why I’ve relished in escaping into the realm of the supernatural. There are no holier-than-thou spirits. Stupidity too seems rectified by death. It’s one big melting pot of beings, absent of hierarchy and judgment. It doesn’t matter if you’re white, black, Christian, Buddhist, gay, etc. In the afterlife, spooks are spooks.

    Paranormal investigators, on the other hand, are on the opposite end of the spectrum. Moral criticism in commonplace. We attack each other on our beliefs and theories. If someone decides to earn a few doubloons in their paranormal pursuit, they face harsh criticism from the rest of the mob. Those exploring the parapsychological paths in the field distance themselves from the “commoner ‘ghost hunter’”. You have extreme scientists and carefree enthusiasts. And they all seem to hate each other.

    I’ll be blunt and shameless and come right out and say it: I am not a scientist. I have no white lab coat. I’m not spending every waking moment testing fine-tuned hypotheses and waiting with baited breath for a positive result. When I began studying ghosts in my teenage years, I wanted to prove to the world that they existed beyond a shadow of a doubt. Nowadays, I feel less militant.

    If anything, I consider myself more of the reporter. The social worker. The psychologist. I want to explore who the people were when they were alive, what happened to them, where they lived and traveled, and why they stayed. Are they still the same people even without a body? Do they linger out of shame or contentment?

    That’s where I become the radical. I believe people who call in exorcists to get rid of a simple ghost should be beaten repeatedly with a stick. I believe there are no simple scientific answers that will suddenly explain everything. I believe that there is fun and humor to be found in the afterlife. These are the things that make me a heathen, idiot, and unprofessional in the eyes of many.

    But so what? Hart Crane lived his short life to its fullest. He never let a few opinions stop him. he never apologized for being different. none of us really should. No matter what we do or say in life, someone will take issue with something. There is always someone better or smarter. I’d rather be a fool at times and live an amusing life than please the world and end up miserable.

    Life’s too short… and the afterlife’s too unpredictable.

    No Man is an Island…


    2008 - 07.28

    For quite some time now, I have felt the rumblings of a broadening schism in my life. I feel isolated and secluded, not merely in the physical sense, but in more metaphorical and philosophical terms as well. The chasm is intangible, psychological, yet has the same effect on the psyche as gazing out across the Grand Canyon.

    I remember peering into a parking lot weeks ago, seeing pigeons clustered together seeking out food. On the fringe of the flock stood a few gulls, standing out like a sore thumb. Segregated by differences.

    I can relate entirely.

    I feel greatly disassociated from many people I know, much as a rat would feel in the company of mice. It is possible to cloak oneself in his surroundings for brief periods, but the charade is difficult to maintain. I am not someone who can set aside their differences with ease. I pride myself in being an individual: viewing life and the world from a multitude of angles. Convention is, at times, a foreign concept to me. My likes and dislikes may be obscure, but they are my own.

    If a baby chick becomes injured and bleeding, the others will peck it to death, viewing it as an unwanted foreign intruder. Human beings react in the same manner. We tend not to embrace diversity as much as attack it. Ostracize it. In all walks of life, conformity is never cast upon us but merely alluded to in not-so-subtle ways.

    We expect things and even make demands of others. Behaviors must rhyme with those of our peers. Opinions which do not mirror our associates are mocked and ridiculed. Gestures are taken for granted. Equality and selflessness become idealistic myths in the pastures of our society. The same thoughts are regurgitated time and again as we chew on the cud of our existence.

    While we all have the same wants and needs, no two people are alike. Each of us is the product of his or her own environment, beliefs, and upbringing. Differing views and lifestyles are not wrong by being different. Prioritizing wants in an unconventional way isn’t wrong. Asking for harmony or the return of a favor is not ludicrous or selfish.

    Many of us fail to see the world beyond our own eyes. We fail to realize that differences are wonderful, giving and receiving go hand in hand, and everyone wasn’t meant to be the same. Maybe we’re too busy casting judgment.

    Seeing is Believing…


    2008 - 07.24

    After an interesting discussion this week on skepticism and the paranormal, I have come to a grave and unfortunate conclusion: in the eyes of true skeptics, I do not exist.

    I don’t mean to say that my beliefs are unfounded or my views are ignored. I mean that as a gay male, I am as fictitious of an entity as a phantasm.

    According to the American Psychological Association, “ There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors.

    In other words, while scientists and experts have diligently attempted to prove the existence of homosexuality in a legitimate, biological manner, they have failed to find any concrete evidence. Therefore, under scientific scrutiny, the existence of homosexuality is bunk.

    Following the CFI’s method of inquiry, based on the work of Bertrand Russell in his essay, “The Ethics of Belief”, :

    1. “we should not accept a belief as true if there is a preponderance of evidence against it, or if it is found to be rationally inconsistent with other well-founded beliefs, or both. To cling to beliefs for which there are abundant evidence and reasons to the contrary is irrational. Another application of this rule is reasonable, that is,
    2. that we ought not to accept a belief as true if there is inadequate evidence and insufficient reasons to do so, and conversely,
    1. we should accept a belief claim only if it is based on adequately justifying reasons and sufficient evidence. A corollary of this is that
    2. where we do not have adequate grounds for believing that something is the case, then we should, wherever possible, adopt the stance of the skeptic and suspend judgment.”

    So, let’s examine the evidence, shall we?

    There are websites, books, and social groups from around the globe openly discussing homosexuality. These can be quite misleading to the general public. People claim to be homosexual, yet science cannot back up these claims with hard evidence. An abundance of people know of or have witnessed homosexuals, but this is mere hearsay. And then there are the photographs and videos of homosexual people and acts. Seriously, these can easily be faked.

    How can any logical human believe we really exist?

    As a society, we must learn to be more critical thinkers and not merely follow blindly the beliefs and ideas passed along to us by others.

    But don’t take my word for it. After all, I’m not real.